Needs of the Many

Bring Your Lies & Half-Truths … I Will Destroy Them

Archive for the ‘Religion’ Category

Obama Puts The Brakes On Fort Hood Hearing

Posted by Casey on November 16, 2009

What’s up Obama’s sleeve here? Why would he stop the briefing?

The Senate Armed Services Committee postponed its Monday briefing on the deadly Fort Hood massacre at the behest of the White House, despite calls from some lawmakers to press forward with a congressional investigation into the shooting rampage that killed 13 and wounded 29.

There’s no need to delay it for evidence gathering purposes. I’ll be following this for you.

Posted in Conspiracy, Democrats, Government, Military, obama, Politics, Religion, Terrorism | Comments Off on Obama Puts The Brakes On Fort Hood Hearing

Ahmadinejad: Obama must choose between Israel and Iran | Iranian – Iran News | Jerusalem Post

Posted by Casey on November 11, 2009

Iranian President Mahmoud...

The jihadi world is making a go at picking America’s friends. Will the ‘O’ listen?

Jerusalem Post:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called on the US to choose between Israel and Iran on Tuesday night, according to Iranian state media.

Speaking in Istanbul at the 25th Session of the Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation (COMCEC) of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, the Iranian president said that it was up to US President Barack Obama to illustrate his motto of “change”.

“The support of both Israel and Iran can’t go hand in hand,” he was quoted as saying by IRNA. “No change is made unless great choices are made.

“We would welcome the changes, and wait for big and correct decisions to be made… We will clasp any hand that is extended sincerely toward us, but changes should be made in practice.”

Addressing the same conference a day earlier, Ahmadinejad said that capitalist excesses caused the global economic meltdown and were un-Islamic, as leaders at a Muslim forum touted their religion’s banking system a way to revive battered economies.

Tried telling you all the jihadis were socialist.

Posted in Hate, Human Rights, International, Iran, Israel, obama, Palestine, Politics, Religion, Terrorism | Comments Off on Ahmadinejad: Obama must choose between Israel and Iran | Iranian – Iran News | Jerusalem Post

Fort Hood Shooter Is Terrorist Jihadi, Military Knew About It Months Ago.

Posted by Casey on November 9, 2009

landing-page_1517912cThere is so much wrong with this case. Why did he get promoted when he had poor performance reviews? Why didn’t Army brass take action when his pro-terrorist writings, musings, arguments, and the like became known?

Now the military is saying they were aware that he tried to contact al Qaeda?

ABC News:

U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan was attempting to make contact with people associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News.

It is not known whether the intelligence agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said.

Jesus Christ!

I remember the good ‘ol days when we used to remove, isolate, interrogate, and possibly kill these threats.  Now we just move them around, give them promotions, and let them work with our returning veterans.

Is political correctness to blame for this tragedy?

One person says that it is, and good American soldiers are dead because of a fear of being honest.

We must rid ourselves of the foolish notion that we’re being broadminded when we ignore vitriolic loathing of our culture and our lifestyle. Refusing to take action against evil for fear of being guilty of stereotyping has resulted in flag-draped coffins for thirteen of America’s finest. What occurred at Fort Hood is even more stunning because it exposes a weak-willed mentality that has become woven into the fabric of the mightiest military force in the history of the world.

Now we’ve also learned that one of Maj. Hasan’s friends was happy he killed these soldiers.

Questions were being asked in Texas this weekend about the friendship between the US Army psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan, who killed 13 people in a shooting spree at the Fort Hood military base last Thursday, and a young man called Duane Reasoner Jnr. Interviewed by the BBC on Friday, Reasoner said he felt no pity for Hasan’s victims because “they were troops who were going to Afghanistan and Iraq to kill Muslims”.

A tape of the interview, conducted by Gavin Lee of the BBC, has ended up on YouTube and other sites and is getting an angry response from Americans still shocked by Hasan’s deadly rampage.

Reasoner is 20 years younger than Hasan. The pair became friends through the local mosque in Killeen – the nearest town to the vast army camp – where Hasan regularly prayed and where Reasoner, who was brought up as a Catholic, was completing his conversion to Islam.

I was listening to the radio the other day, and callers were still arguing against calling this what it is … a terrorist, jihadi attack on the United States.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Posted in Al Qaeda, Censorship, Conspiracy, Hate, Idiots, Iraq, Military, Outrage, Patriotism, Politics, Religion, Terrorism, Traitors, Truth | Comments Off on Fort Hood Shooter Is Terrorist Jihadi, Military Knew About It Months Ago.

Those Damn Jews Are Breaking Up The Family

Posted by Casey on June 10, 2009

DETROIT, MI - APRIL 27:  Rev. Jeremiah Wright ...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife
Antisemitism runs strong in our president’s background, and his utter lack of interest in Israel’s safety is proof that it did take hold of him.
clipped from

Asked if he had spoken to the President, Wright said: “Them Jews aren’t going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter, that he’ll talk to me in five years when he’s a lame duck, or in eight years when he’s out of office. …
“They will not let him to talk to somebody who calls a spade what it is. … I said from the beginning: He’s a politician; I’m a pastor. He’s got to do what politicians do.”
Wright also said Obama should have sent a U.S. delegation to the World Conference on Racism held recently in Geneva, Switzerland, but that the president did not do so for fear of offending Jews and Israel.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Posted in Democrats, Hate, Human Rights, Hypocrisy, Idiots, Israel, obama, Palestine, Racism, Religion, Terrorism, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Comments Off on Those Damn Jews Are Breaking Up The Family

What Happens When A Libtard Tries To Interview The Taliban? A Giant Orgy, Of Course!

Posted by Casey on June 8, 2009

H/t Gatewaypundit

Joanie de Rijke2

They are calling it rape, but clearly it wasn’t rape if she was down with it.

In November 2008 a Dutch journalist, Joanie de Rijke, was abducted by Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. She was held captive, raped repeatedly, and released after six days for a ransom of 100,000 euros ($137,000). After her ordeal, she acknowledged that her captors “did horrible things to me,” but added in several media interviews “They also respected me,” and emphasized “They are not monsters.”

In a speech in the Dutch Parliament last Thursday, the Dutch opposition leader Geert Wilders referred to Joanie de Rijke’s case.

“She was raped, but she was not angry. The journalist who went looking for the Taliban in Afghanistan saw her curiosity end in a cruel ordeal of multiple rape. While this would make others angry or sad, this journalist shows understanding. She says: ‘They also respected me.’ And she was given tea and biscuits.”

By now many of you are confused … welcome to the club. Are we really to believe that a rape occurred, but was ‘ok’ because the raper respected the rapee by giving her tea and biscuits? Maybe a direct quote from the victim adulterer will help sort this out.

During her captivity, de Rijke was raped repeatedly by Gul. In her book In de handen van de Taliban, which she published last month, she writes that the Taliban commander

“could not control his testosterone. I had the impression that afterwards he regretted what had happened. He knew it was wrong.”

The noble savage even “invited her to a threesome,” i.e. to have sex with him and one of his three wives.

Uh huh?

So the rape was ok because she was shown respect, she refuses to paint the Taliban as monsters, and her rapist invited her to join in a threesome (did she accept)?

Given that she is referred to repeatedly as “Mrs.” I am to assume she is married. Here’s my take on this. I don’t think she has stockholm syndrome at all. I believe she is so enamored with the Taliban that she desired a sexual encounter with this man. Then to gain sympathy, notoriety, and save her marriage she claimed the consensual encounter was rape.

Before you all start thinking harsh of me I would like to ask you a question to ponder. Would a rapist ever invite his victim to have a threesome with his wife?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Posted in Afghanistan, Human Rights, Idiots, MSM Lies, Religion, Terrorism | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Iranian Streets “On Fire” In Celebration Of Obama’s Inauguration

Posted by Casey on January 20, 2009

As I told you the other day … Obama is having some problems delivering on his promise to mend fences with Iran, and our allies.

Let the festivities continue!

clipped from

Posted in Election, Hate, International, Iran, obama, Religion, Terrorism, Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

Twinkle, Twinkle Little Palestinian Terrorist

Posted by Casey on January 15, 2009

I had this forwarded to me from a friend, and felt it worth sharing. Not because you don’t already know this, but so that you have a source of info to share with others.

Be sure to watch until near the end when there is video footage of Palestinian terrorists using small children as human shields.

Don’t forget about Assud, the Jew eating rabbit, that Hamas uses to indoctrinate kids. Unfortunately, the IAF killed him in the latest hostilities.

Before Assud, there was Farfur the mouse who was assasinated by a Mossad agent, and Nakhol who died from cancer after Israel refused to treat him.

Posted in Hate, Human Rights, Hypocrisy, International, Israel, Palestine, Religion, Sad, Terrorism, Truth, U.N. | Tagged: , , | Comments Off on Twinkle, Twinkle Little Palestinian Terrorist

More Legal Hypocrisy In Death Of Fetus

Posted by Casey on November 9, 2008

Notice: I am not advocating any position for either pro-life or pro-choice in this post. My point is that the legal code of the United States is blatantly hypocritical when it comes to what is alive, and what is property.

There is a horrible case here in Vegas in which an 18 week old fetus was shot and killed during a murder. Our District Attorney, David Roger, has found a loophole in which he can charge the murderer with manslaughter as well because of the 18 week old fetus.

clipped from

The man who authorities allege used a chain saw and assault rifle to shoot into his estranged wife’s apartment, killing her boyfriend and the woman’s unborn child, will be charged in the slaying of the 18-week-old fetus, the Clark County district attorney said today.

District Attorney David Roger said lawyers in his office reviewed the case and determined they will pursue an additional charge of “manslaughter, killing of an unborn quick child,” against 25-year-old William John Keck.

blog it

A “quick child” is a child that has moved in the mother’s womb. The DA wasn’t originally going to be able to charge Keck with the death of the fetus.

clipped from

Police said Monday that they did not expect to charge William Keck in connection with the slaying of the fetus because it had not reached 25 weeks gestation, which Nevada law requires for a homicide charge. But Roger said a different state law that carries a possible sentence of one to 10 years would apply in this case.

“We did some research of the definition of an unborn quick child,” Roger said. “It is any movement of a fetus in a mother’s womb.”

blog it

Naturally, some people are mortified that you can’t charge someone with murder for the death of a fetus, but in the US legal code a fetus is property … not life. A mother’s body is her property, and she may do as she wishes with it.  That is how the courts determine that a mother has the right to abort a pregnancy. The mother would not have that right without a fetus being designated ‘property’ by the courts.

That’s the hypocrisy. How can you charge someone with murder (as some states do), or manslaughter in the death of a fetus if the fetus is ‘legally’ considered property? The answer is, you can’t. At least you shouldn’t be allowed to, but the courts are so convoluted when it comes to life that these loopholes exist. What makes the matter worse is how utterly stupid the pro-lifers and pro-choicers are in their dealing with this issue. The pro-lifers never use logical arguments backed up by the law, and science, to make their case. The pro-choicers are so retarded that they actually think the choice of the mother is the only thing that creates a distinction between life and property.

Read some of the comments from the newspaper’s website about these charges:

Erin wrote on November 06, 2008 12:42 PM:

I don’t know how anyone can classify this as an abortion issue. An abortion is any SURGICAL method of removing a fetus to end a pregnancy. I don’t know what article you are reading, but no where did I read anything about a surgical act, just a poor soon-to-be-mother who was brutally attacked and lost 2 very important people in her life! Neighbors or no neighbors, how many of you are going to try and stop someone who has a chainsaw and a gun? Hopefully you would call 911, but by the time anyone got there, this horrible crime would have already been finished. So everyone needs to get off their politcal soapboxes and pray, send good vibes, or whatever it is you do, for Angel for a full recovery! My goodness, where is the heart and compassion for humankind!

mercy me wrote on November 06, 2008 03:46 PM:

Hey Pro lifers! How incompetent of you. When women have an Abortion it is their choice to do so. whether you disagree or not it is still a LEGAL procedure. When a psychopath shoots you and kills your baby against your will, that is called MURDER. Why don’t you go Protest in front of an abortion clinic where you could possibly change someones mind and do some good, as opposed to throwing your useless beliefs in a conversation that isn’t even about abortion

Both of these people, and their respective supporters on the thread, are flat-out idiots. This case IS an abortion issue because the only reason a pregnant woman has the right to abort is because the fetus is considered her property. Since, legally speaking, an 18 week old fetus is only considered property … how can this guy be charged with manslaughter? It flies in the face of our current legal code as it pertains to the legal standing of a fetus. Furthermore, the notion that a fetus ceases to be a woman’s property because another party killed it is extremely uneducated and juvenile. Either the fetus is someone’s property, or it is not … which is it?

The truth is … we don’t know. I’m, of course, only referring to the legal code. Not your personal beliefs. If a fetus is property, as it is in the law, then you can not charge anyone with the death of a fetus. Period … end of story. If you are going to charge someone with the death of a fetus, then it is not property and must be considered a living being. Period … end of story. If we go the route of a fetus being property then we can only charge this Keck guy with malicious destruction of property, and nothing else. If the fetus is considered a living being we must also charge the mother with ending a life. Our legal code is meant to be applied uniformly, but it currently isn’t meeting that requirement when it comes to a fetus. Nor is it meeting that requirement when it comes to animals as well.

If the fetus is property then the mother has the right to do as she wishes with her property. That same standard is not applied to her pets though. This is intriguing, and enraging to me at the same time. Your pet is considered your property under the law. That is, until you harm your pet. Then the pet ceases to be property, and becomes a living creature. What the hell is that about? Either the pet is property, and I can do as I wish to it. Or the pet is a living creature, and I must treat it as such. Pets actually have more protection under the law than a fetus. Did you know that?

In both of these examples of hypocrisy in our legal code we must decide whether or not a fetus, or pet, is alive. Or if the two are considered property. This latest case is serving as an additional example of how convoluted our laws have become as a result of activist judges passing legislation they constitutionally aren’t allowed to pass. That’s all Roe v. Wade was. An illegal ruling by the court that is expressly forbidden by the US Constitution … regardless of your stance on life.

Legally speaking, this guy is being over charged for his crime.  Howver, I applaud David Roger for his ingenuity in finding a life-based charge in the Nevada legal code. Non of this takes away from the fact that we have to make a final decision, at some point, on what is property and what is life.

So what do you think? Is a fetus life, or property?

Posted in Abortion, Constitution, Human Rights, Hypocrisy, Legal, Medical, Religion, Science, Truth | Tagged: , , , | 4 Comments »

Obama Admits He’s “Boneheaded”

Posted by Casey on October 15, 2008

At least he admitted that his boneheaded comments about religious people who support the 2nd Amendment was … well … boneheaded.


Speaking to the New York Times in an interview set to be published Sunday, Obama said his now-infamous comments at a San Francisco fundraiser last April — during which he said some small town Americans “cling” to guns and religion — was “my biggest boneheaded move.”

“How it was interpreted in the press was Obama talking to a bunch of wine-sipping San Francisco liberals with an anthropological view toward white working-class voters,” Obama told the Times.

So now that Obama has admitted his mistake, has he changed his tune? Nope, he just lied about.

“And I was actually making the reverse point, clumsily, which is that these voters have a right to be frustrated because they’ve been ignored. And because Democrats haven’t met them halfway on cultural issues, we’ve not been able to communicate to them effectively an economic agenda that would help broaden our coalition.”

Uh, huh?

Let’s examine his full statement, and see if we can deduce that he was actually saying that they were “frustrated” because Democrats have ignored them.

Obama’s full statement that day:

“Our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there’s not evidence of that in their daily lives,” he said. “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are going to regenerate and they have not.

“And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

Yep, still sound just as bad as it did then when he said. Even with his latest explanation of what he was “trying” to convey.

Obama is only supporting what Biden said a while back. That Democrats have no faith in the American people.

People don’t need religion, or guns to explain how frustrated they are by a government who failed them. They aren’t going to have antipathy towards people who aren’t like them because they’ve been ignored. Perhaps some of their anti-immigrant views stem from losing jobs overseas because of unions, but there isn’t a major anti-immigrant feeling in this country. There is a major anti-illegal immigrant sentiment in this country, and there is a huge difference.

Essentially he’s saying that they are God-fearing, gun toting bigits, but it is the government’s fault.

Let’s examine Obama’s antipathy comments, and use them against him. One could argue that many of his supporters have antipathy for those not like them. Such as those who are successful, or dare I say white.

Hey, if I’m going to be called a racist for not voting for a black guy … then they are going to be called racist for not voting for a white guy.

The poor typically have an anti-immigrant attitude as well. Why? Because it is the illegals who take the jobs that Americans won’t do, remember? Remedial labor jobs that could be providing support for those poor folks in the US who need to provide for their family.

Many of Obama’s supporters cling to their guns as well. Some, probably, as a way of providing for their family. You don’t really think that the whole “thug thizzle” crowd is law abiding do you?

Clearly only a minority of Obama supporters that I’ve seen strike me as criminals, but it can still be argued. If you embrace the thug life, what am I supposed to think?

So, you see Obama, both you and McCain have supporters that cling to religion, guns, and antipathy while harboring anti-immigrant feelings.

Before I start getting allegations of racism here by you small-minded nitwits. I used far-fetched arguments to argue the counter to Obama’s far-fetched arguments. Don’t take it so seriously.

Posted in Democrats, Election, Hate, Hypocrisy, obama, Outrage, Politics, Racism, Religion, Sad, Truth | Tagged: , | Comments Off on Obama Admits He’s “Boneheaded”

Anti-McCain Ad To Focus On Incest

Posted by Casey on September 26, 2008

Welcome GatewayPundit, LGF, Freepers and other readers.  The response to this post has been stellar.  I’ve been moderating a debate today, and hadn’t look at the site until now.  You guys have been awesome.

This is a Needs of the Many exclusive. If you see this post anywhere else it is because they are citing my work (which is great, and encouraged), or they are stealing my work. Please report back if you see this post anywhere else without a link back to my site.  I’ve been having a problem with theft of my posts … thank you.

Fax of job for anti-McCain incest ad.

Fax of job for anti-McCain incest ad.

A few days ago I was listening to the radio, and heard that there was an ad looking for actors from a talent agency that wanted a girl for an anti-McCain/pro-Obama commercial. Not a big deal, right? I didn’t think so either until the host of the show I was listening to read the contents of the job opportunity. This is a new low for the campaign. Click the picture above to read the job opportunity, and the “motivation” the actor should have for the part.

Casey refers to Casey Hendrickson on KXNT. I was listening to his show when he announced that he was sent this from another listener. I sent him an email, and asked if I could have the ad … this is what he sent me. He said he blacked out some usernames, and email addresses to protect privacy.

Notice the project name is “Anti Palin/McCain Political Ad” … they didn’t even have the ticket right. The actress will also not be paid for her work. Instead she will get a DVD of her commercial for her portfolio. It’s called TFDVD (time for DVD), and it is common in the modeling world if you are a model trying to get noticed.

The actress should be 15-19, and “break your heart” without saying a word. Her role is that of a victim of incest or rape who is now pregnant, and “forced to keep her child b/c Roe v. Wade overturned means no exception for rape or incest.”

LOL … wow! Talk about fear-mongering. There are so many problems with this ad, but that’s common with liberal advertisements.

The president, should McCain win, has no authority to overturn Roe v. Wade. Certainly, the vice president has no such authority. Yet Palin is getting top billing for this job. The president’s only authority in the matter is to appoint judges to the Supreme Court. Any judge appointed to the Supreme Court by the president must be approved by the Senate using “advise and consent.” So if McCain appoints a judge to the Supreme Court who is interested in reversing Roe v. Wade … they will have to be approved by the Senate first, and with a 2/3 majority. McCain has also made it clear that he will not have a litmus test on abortion for judges he’d appoint.

I’m also unaware of any proposed change to Roe v. Wade that removes the abortion option in cases of incest or rape. I could be wrong, but every proposal I can think of off the top of my head would allow abortion in the case of incest, rape or the health of the mother. In fact, McCain has made it clear that he supports abortion in cases of rape or incest. It’s a stance he’s always had. So attacking him on it is literally a lie.

This is what he told the NY Times on his incest/rape abortion stance in his previous run for president.

McCain was asked whether he would reinstate the Reagan era rule that prevents international family planning clinics that receive federal funds from discussing abortion. “I don’t believe they should advocate abortion with my tax dollars,” McCain said, adding that he opposed abortion except in cases of rape and incest. He was then asked how he would determine whether someone had in fact been raped. McCain responded, “I think that I would give the benefit of the doubt to the person who alleges that.”

New York Times, p. A17 Jan 25, 2000

McCain also has a long history of supporting changing the culture of abortion in the US rather than just pulling Roe v. Wade. Although he has repeatedly stated that Roe v. Wade was a mistake. He’s right there. Factually, Roe v. Wade was a mistake because it was an illegal ruling by the Supreme Court who was stepping WAY out of their legal power.

So, literally the ad has nothing on McCain at all.

Palin has a more strict pro-life stance than McCain, and the ad will likely be catering to the anti-Palin crowd. Palin opposes abortion in all cases except the health of the mother. However, the attempts to paint her as cruel are unfounded. The ad we are discussing also blows it here as well.

The ad says that the girl was “forced to keep her child” because Roe v. Wade was overturned. That’s also a blatant lie. No one would be forced to keep the child. There is always adoption.  So even if the most strict restrictions are placed upon abortion, no matter how unlikely, there will always be adoption to a loving home.  Palin doesn’t believe the child should be punished for the actions of the parents.

No doubt the ad will certainly anger a large segment of the population that is so far beyond ignorant that we don’t have a word for them yet, but it doesn’t change the fact that the ad is full of conjecture based on lies. I hope the Dems are not stupid enough to run the ad in Nebraska. It’s actually legal to abandon your kids there, and a guy just got rid of nine of them.


Gateway Pundit: Today’s NY Times Palin Smear Piece… Based On COMPLETE LIE


GatewayPundit has a post up about how the Obama campaign went out and looked for rape victims after Palin was announced as VP candidate.

Gateway Pundit: Obama Campaign Looked For Rape Victims For Ads After Palin Was Nominated

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

Posted in Abortion, Constitution, Democrats, Election, Government, Hate, Human Rights, Legal, palin, Politics, Religion, Republicans, Truth | Tagged: , , , | 19 Comments »