How do I start this?
Ok … here it goes.
While Stumbling today I ran across a post on the website of the International Planned Parenthood Federation. It’s somewhat vulgar, and I hesitated in using the ‘p’ word in the title of this post. There was just no other way to convey what was being said.
The post is nothing more than typical feminist nonsense designed to turn young girls and women into unmarriable whores under the guise of “empowerment” … um, yeah.
Here, it’s better to read it yourself.
Since not every woman uses the word pussy to refer to her genitals, some people might think I have chosen this title to be provocative.
Which is partly true.
Not all women call their genitals pussy, and many have no particular name for them in a sexual context. And that is the problem: there is a lack of strong, positive words for the female genitalia, and those that do exist are often used as terms of abuse.
This was my reasoning in using the title Pussypedia. I believe that women need a sexual name for their genitals, and that it is up to women to lay claim to the word pussy, or the name used in any language with the same sexual value, and free it from the more offensive sense in which it refers to a woman as a sex object.
I also think it is necessary for little girls to have an official name for their genitals. In Sweden, RFSU uses the name snippa.
It’s nice to see that the author made it clear she was more concerned with being provocative than decent at least.
P***y is a vulgar word … period. It was designed to be one. Just like the male variant c**k. Also designed to be a vulgar word, and is completely used in the same context as the ‘p’ word. It is not a term of empowerment for men in any way that would differentiate from the empowerment value of the other.
This is simple fabricated victimhood in order to perpetuate hatred of men using baseless allegations. If women, and little girls, can be made to believe they are victims … this group can get more members and support.
To “free” the ‘p’ word from the more offensive sense in which it refers to women is to completely change its definition. Something liberals, and quacks like these women have a habit of doing.
The predatory behavior of this group is made crystal clear by their insistence that little girls have a private part empowering word with the same context as the new ‘sexually liberating’ definition of p***y. After all, you can’t fund abortions unless you sexualize young girls by giving them a sexually liberating word for their privates.
Well, I’m off to free the word c**k from the more offensive sense in which it refers to a man as a sex object.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Planned Parenthood: Annual Budget Still Over $1 Billion; More Preborn Children Killed (deaconforlife.blogspot.com)
- If Feminism Were Beneficial for Women…: (brothersjuddblog.com)
- The end of one-size-fits-all feminism (guardian.co.uk)
- More Federal Tax Dollars Go to Abortion Providers on Tax Day 2009 than Just One Year Ago (deaconforlife.blogspot.com)